Land Tenure and Use in Native American Culture

Native Americans believe they are closely linked withhighest bidder as a labor hand for a certain period of
the land and everything that grows on the land ortime, usually a week. At the end of the week, the
lives on the land. Because of this belief, the idea ofIndian would be paid in alcohol, would be arrested
"owning" land did not exist among the Nativeagain on Monday, and the cycle would start
Americans. They lived off the land, but did notover.Another strategy used by the Europeans to
consider that they owned it. This is not to say thatacquire land was by purchasing it from the Native
they shared the land with other tribes, because theyAmericans. Whether through devious actions or
did establish territorial rights to certain parts ofignorance of Indian ways, the Europeans would get a
America among the many tribes. Intrusion intofew tribal members to sell the land, which caused
another tribe's territory was considered an invasionconflict within the tribe. For example, Tecumseh, a
and was often met with warfare.Before contact withShawnee, protested the sell of his tribal lands in the
Europeans, most of the Native Americans lived infollowing way:The white people have no right to take
hunter/gatherer communities composed of smallthe land from the Indians, because they had it first; it
populations of people. A few tribes had settled intois theirs. They may sell, but all must join. Any sale not
farming communities before the coming ofmade by all is not valid. The late sale is bad. It was
Europeans, but these were rare. The Nativemade by a part only. Part do not know how to sell. It
Americans set up their community with an equalrequires all to make a bargain for all (Hurtado,
division of labor between men and women. Women171).Another land issue that caused conflict within the
controlled the use of the land and men controlled theNative American peoples was the policy of removing
distribution of goods from the land. Goods wereIndians from their traditional homelands onto
considered community property with the whole tribereservations. A good example of this is the removal
sharing in equal parts.Before contact with Europeans,of the Cherokee Indians from Georgia into
land tenure and use favored women. Inheritancepresent-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee newspaperman
passed through the maternal side and womenElias Boudinot, although initially opposing removal,
controlled the use of the land. The Iroquois womencame "to believe that removal was necessary to
also controlled the community's store of goods, insave the Cherokee nation" (Hurtado 207). After the
addition to farming in female cooperatives. TheCherokees had been removed to Oklahoma,
Northwest Tlingit women handled any money in theopponents of the removal "killed Boudinot and other
tribe, as men were thought to be foolish in theirIndians who had signed the removal treaty" (Hurtado
spending habits. The Tlingit women also controlled207).After all the Native Americans had been
any fur transactions. In nomadic tribes, such as theremoved unto reservations, the federal government
Plains Indians, women owned and distributed all thepassed the Dawes Act of 1887. This law divided the
domestic goods, while men controlled all items relatingreservation lands into sections for private ownership,
to hunting and warfare.When the Europeans arrivedthus destroying the concept of sharing lands
in America, they were shocked by the Nativecommunally. Because of the Dawes Act, the Indians
Americans' matriarchal and matrilineal system. Thelost two of every three acres held before 1887. The
European conquerors began to chain the Nativepurpose of this law was to halt the Indians' nomadic
Americans to the land through farming. As with thelifestyle by turning them into farmers.Since Native
Twa tribe, many Native American tribes wereAmerican peoples had no concept of land ownership,
subjected to the Spanish system of encomienda,the European invaders considered the land to be up
which remained in effect in New Mexico betweenfor grabs. The Europeans used a variety of ways to
1600 and 1680. This Spanish system "provided forgain control of the land. They used deception on
the involuntary seizure of a percentage of eachMontezuma. They ignored Indian political practices by
Pueblo farmer's crop every year to support Spanishhaving a few Indians sell the lands. And when all else
missionary, military, and civil institutions" (Folsomfailed, the federal government passed laws to
14).The Native Americans in California territory wererelocate the Indians and resorted to warfare if they
also induced into forced labor. The Spanish, and laterresisted.BibliographyFolsom, Franklin. Indian Uprising on
the Mexicans, occupying this territory establishedthe Rio Grande. University of Mexico Press,
legislation that authorized the arrest of any Indian for1996.Hurtado, Albert, Peter Iverson, and Thomas
drunkenness, or even just loitering, upon thePaterson, editors. Major Problems in American Indian
complaint of any citizen. Once the Indian wasHistory: Documents and Essays. Houghton Mifflin
arrested, he or she must pay a fine or be sold to theCompany Collegiate Division, 2000.