Are Environmentalists Lying About Cancer Statistics to Prevent Uranium Mining?

It's pretty easy to frighten a person. Just tellMexicans are more likely to die from lung cancer at a
someone he or she will get cancer from something.rate nearly four times higher than American Indians.
Bringing up increased cancer rates caused by whatDr. Wiggins minimized the impact of uranium
one does, e.g. what one eats, where one lives, whatcontamination or ionizing radiation as the logic behind
chemicals one ingests and so forth, may be greatspecific cancers. For example, when questioned about
coffee shop chatter. But, one should get their"increasing breast cancer rates," he cited changes in a
statistics and research in order before publiclywoman's fertility (for example, birth control pills) and
pronouncing judgment on the source of a cancer. Ifobesity as the main drivers. Wiggins said, "Higher
they want to be taken seriously. Environmentalistsbreast cancer incidence occurs in Long Island (New
may have some secret statistics generally unavailableYork) or Marin County (California) because higher
to the public for which they insist uranium ISL (in situbreast cancer rates were found mainly among rich,
leach mining) projects "might" cause an increase inwhite people, not in Gallup, New Mexico.
cancer rates.According to actual University of New Mexico data,
We met with Joseph J. Kolb, editor and publisher ofAmerican Indian cancer statistics are lower than
"The Gallup Herald," to hear his thoughts about thethose for Anglos and Hispanics. Dr. Wiggins explained,
proposed uranium ISL projects in Gallup area. During"Of the 50,000 to 60,000 Navajos living in New
the course of our conversation, Mr. Kolb made hisMexico, Navajos have about half the rate of cancer
views known. Then, he preserved for posteritycompared to Anglos and half the risk of developing
those comments in an editorial he published oncancer." Dr. Wiggins also noted that the Laguna
November 13th. Kolb preached, "Uranium mining onPueblo Indians living near the former Jackpile uranium
the reservation can and has detrimentally affectedmine have lower cancer rates compared to the rest
Gallup... There have also been stories of theof New Mexico. Dr. Wiggins agreed that the rate of
disproportionately high rate of breast, cervical andkidney cancers had increased a bit, but explained it
ovarian cancer here. Researchers continue to studywas caused by increased diabetes and obesity, not
the possible correlation between the 1979 spillfrom another source.
(Puerco River valley spill) and its effect on the localAccording to the National Program of Cancer
cancer rate."Registries, the range of ovarian deaths among
Kolb confided to us, "I know at least 15 women withwomen living in New Mexico is between 9.9 and 14.3
breast cancer." He also claimed to have investigatedper 100,000, with an 11.9 average rate. The American
the cancer statistics through the New MexicoIndian rate is 13.4, but the non-Hispanic white rate is
Environmental Department and the American Cancer14.1. Nationally, the average for all races is 13.1. All
Society. In his mind, the transplanted ex-New Yorkerstatistics reported were for year 2002. Dr. Wiggins's
Kolb blames Gallup's cancer rate on a uranium tailingsresearch showed a rate of 13.4 among American
spill, which occurred in 1979. At one point during theIndian women for the period 1998 through 2002. The
conversation, Kolb admitted he had previouslyrate is neither alarming nor "disproportionately high" as
thought uranium mining might have been good forMr. Kolb suggested. There are other states with
the local economy because of the royalties suchhigher ovarian cancer rates among women, such as
operations would throw off. Along the way, heMontana, Washington, Nevada, Alabama, West
changed his mind.Virginia, New Jersey and New York. It is similar to the
It sounds very convincing, and perhaps Kolb's readersovarian cancer rate for the entire Western United
swallowed his editorial rhetoric hook-line-and-sinker. Dr.States, but still lower than the Northeastern U.S.
Charles Wiggins, Director and Principal Investigator forWhen discussing cancer rate statistics, Craig Bartels,
the New Mexico Tumor Registry at the University ofPresident of Hydro Resources which hopes to start
New Mexico's Cancer Research and TreatmentISL operations in New Mexico, also did his homework,
Center, didn't. He scoffed at Kolb's claims and"When you do the math, the Navajo cancer rate is
commented, "A lot of people say these things, but30% less than the general U.S. rate. Among the
when I go in and investigate I invariably find out theyNavajo, 87.5 deaths of every 100,000 are cancer
are wrong." As an epidemiologist, Dr. Wiggins dealsrelated. The U.S. is 125.6 deaths of every 100,000 are
with the study of the causes of disease incancer related."
populations.It is a troubling experience to realize how official and
Dr. Wiggins presented us with the most recentscientific statistics are readily dismissed by radical
report of cancers among New Mexico Americanenvironmentalists. In Albuquerque, we discussed the
Indian females. The incident rate, between 1998 andUniversity of New Mexico statistics with Southwest
2002, was 48 deaths per 100,000. The breast cancerResearch and Information Center, SRIC, office
death rate, throughout New Mexico during the samemanager, Annette Aguayo, and editor of their
time frame, was 110 per 100,000. In the Mountainin-house quarterly report, Voices from the Earth. Her
States, comprising Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana,response to our undercover editorial team? "Oh,
Nevada and New Mexico, that rate rose to 119.4. Forthose are government statistics. We don't trust
the entire Western United States, the death ratethose." Her comments makes one wonder where the
stood at 128.8, about the range for the nationalNew Mexico media, such as editor/publisher Joseph
average of 124.9. That was 260 percent higher thanKolb, get their statistics when blaming uranium mining
the breast cancer rate for the American Indians infor rising cancer rates. As Don Quixote sang in the
New Mexico, a group covered in this report. Hispanicmusical, Man of La Mancha, "Facts are the enemy of
women in New Mexico died from breast cancer attruth." Might this also apply to the data SRIC has
more than double that rate, during that time frame.been supplying the local media and disseminating
A frequent lament about uranium mining, found in theamong the Navajos?
anti-nuclear propaganda, is the absolutely amazing highJoseph Kolb may have more woes on his mind than
rate of lung cancer deaths suffered by the Navajo.uranium mining. Recently, the "Gallup Independent"
Having been influenced by that party line, the Navajoreported on Kolb's money woes. His weekly "Gallup
Nation president Joe Shirley Jr. banned uranium on theHerald" continues to get sued and rack up printing
reservation last April. Statistics provided by Dr.bills. Since October, Intermountain Color, which won a
Wiggins demonstrate that the American Indian injudgment against Kolb's newspaper of $61,425, has
New Mexico has one of the lowest lung cancer ratestried to get the debt paid. The Albuquerque Publishing
in the United States. Utah, a state with the lowestcompany filed a lawsuit against the Herald, seeking
incidence of lung cancer deaths, has a rate more thanover $27,000 in unpaid invoices. It was reported Kolb
150 percent higher. Nationwide lung cancer deathowes nearly $11,000 to the "Navajo Times" for
rates are more than 300 percent higher. White Newprinting bills.