Religious Conflict between India Pakistan

It is indeed a shame to associate conflicts withand doing good and giving to relatives. And He
religion. Does Christianity summon Christian extremistsforbids indecency and doing wrong and tyranny. He
to bomb abortion clinics in the West? Does Islamwarns you so that hopefully you will pay heed"
summon Muslims in Palestine to kill Israelis and(Qur'an, 16:90).
themselves in suicidal attacks? Does Hinduism preachEven though religions are essentially about building
kidnap and kill those who are against Hinduism? Topeace, they are unfortunately sosmetimes
most Indians and I am sure Pakistanis as well as alsomisinterpreted and misused. When this happens it is a
to most people of other religion will more than agreeresult of constructions of the mind about religion and
that such practices are wrong and must beabout "the other". In the current global conflict
condemned. Religions do not contain inherentbetween religious fundamentalists and secularists, for
"conflict-genes", making unsolvable conflicts aninstance, each party perceives and talks about the
inevitable outcome of their co-existence. Conflictsother as posing threats to their societal orders and
involving religion are always the result ofways of living. When secularists preach secular state,
misperceptions in our minds.pluralism, and abolishment of Sharia-laws,
In mid-nineties Samuel P. Huntington became widelyfundamentalists perceive it as attacks on Islam.
known for his fright-provoking prediction of a futureSecularists on the other hand perceive religious
worldwide clash of civilizations. This new dilemmafundamentalism as an existential threat to their
would amount to nothing less than a "re-making ofsocieties and ways of life. They almost regard the
the world order". The Cold War logic of states unitingsecular society as something holy. What were once
with either of two ideologically opposed superpowersopen societies have become xenophobic entities.
would be replaced by a pattern of unity determinedMany religious leaders have expressed the need for
by the dominating religions. A possible outcome ofharmony and unity in the fight against terror.
this separation of the world society would be a worldIronically, the biggest obstacle seems to be the
order derived from and determined by religiouspolitical leaders who are fully occupied with
differences. Looking at the current international scenedemonizing "axis's of evil" and "opponents of
one could be tempted to conclude that actualfreedom". There is need for clarification of religion
happenings are giving real life to Huntington's scenario.and its relationship to conflict. Firstly, it must be
Western political elites especially are applying anappreciated that it is not religion as such but specific
approach, portraying Islam as the root cause offundamentalist constructions of religion that produces
terror. This is dangerous. It threatens to demonizeconflict like India Pakistan. Secondly, religious
followers of a specific religion thereby running the riskfundamentalism itself tends to transform religion into
of producing endless counter-demonizations adding toideology. This is an assault on religion that can only be
a security dilemma of Cold War type where everydone well through re-mystification.
step taken by one part is perceived as a threat byReligious conflicts are a product of misperception in
the other who then has to retaliate... Essentially, theour minds. Let us not create another cold war conflict
approach is also an assault on the religion Islam itself.based on them. No religion legitimizes conflict! His
It implies that all Muslims are extremists, which is asExcellency, Mohamed Khatami, Presedent of Iran,
inaccurate as saying that the ultra rightwing moralonce complained in an inter-religious forum: "Dialogue
majority in USA fairly represents Christianity. One ofamongst civilizations, particularly dialogue between
many shortcomings in the world of today is judgingIslam and Christianity is vital, essential and inevitable.
Islam by the conduct of a minority of its people. If aToday, people speak of the global village. However,
religion is to be judged on its role in conflict thisthe problem is that residents of this global village are
should logically be done on the basis of its sources,unable to understand each other. Isn't it catastrophic
not on the basis of extreme acts of a tiny minoritythat people of this village are deaf and dumb and
of its self-proclaimed followers. In the case of Islamworse than that, they have hostile thoughts toward
the sources are the Qur'an and Sunna (teachings ofeach other".
prophet Muhammad), e.g.: "Allah commands justice