Chess - Its Origins And Development

Chess is one of the world's great board games. Forconquered by the Greco-Bactrian kind Demetrius in
centuries chess players around the world have been180 BC.
mesmerized by its challenges, and its great mastersThis kingdom lasted for about 200 years in which
have been revered as superstars of a different ordertime the region underwent a profound synthesis of
-- superstars with brains.Greek and Indian religion, culture, languages and
** Origins and background of chesssymbols. As Wikipedia says, "The Indo-Greek kings
Like many of our popular board games, such asseem to have achieved a level of cultural syncretism
checkers (draughts) and backgammon, chesswith no equivalent in history, the consequences of
originated sometime in the first millenium AD,which are still felt today."
somewhere along the Silk Road that ran betweenThe Greek influence was felt for hundreds of years
Europe, Egypt, India and the Orient. Most historiansafter the demise of the Indo-Greek Kingdom.
trace its origins back to northern India or AfganistanAccording to Averbakh it was this Greek influence
sometime around 600 AD.that "helpd the Indians to make the final step for
As one might expect, there is a good deal ofchess to appear." In particular, he mentions that
controversy among chess historians about both theGreeks brought with them the war game petteia.
date and place of the origin of chess. While someAlthough it was a simpler game, it had two of the
place its origins in China, the most common theory isfeatures that chess would eventually gain -- players
that the version of chess we are familiar withcould "kill" each other, and there were no dice. "It
evolved from a game played in northern India calledwas the player himself who decided where and which
ashtapada. This game used an 8x8 board (like ours),pieces should move. He had complete freedom of
but had 4 players, and moves were determined bychoice."
the throw of dice.** Chess in the Kushan Kingdom
As some historians point out, the unique features ofAnother writer goes even further in placing the
ashtapada, and its successor called chataranga, wereorigins of modern chess in the Afganistan/Northern
deeply embedded in Indian culture of the time. TheIndia region, but places that development much
fact that it was a "four-handed" war game wasearlier than 600 AD. Gerhard Josten, in his article
consistent with the division of the country into many"Chess - A Living Fossil" claims that modern chess is
kingdoms. And the use of dice to determine movesan amalgam of a number of different games. We
was a reflection of the importance of Karma in Indianknow this, Josten claims, because of its completely
religious thought.unique feature of having three different types of
** Evolution into modern chesscharacters:
The gradual appearance of different types of Indian1. A relatively immoble center piece -- the King -- the
military forces in the Indian board game known ascapture of which is the object of the game.
chataranga -- elephants, chariots, cavalry and infantry2. A number of pieces that can make varying long
-- was consistent with the transition of the gamemoves -- moves that cover more than one space.
from a relatively simple "race" game to that of a war3. A number of pieces that can only make short
game.moves -- moves that cover only one space.
In a race game players do not capture or extinguishJosten claims these different pieces originated in
their opponents. If a player lands on the same squaredifferent games, and were amalgamated in what we
as an opponent, the opponent would simply have toknow as modern chess. He claims type 1 pieces
go back to the beginning and start over.originated in Chinese games, type 2 pieces originated
But when the principle of capture or extinction wasin Mesopotamian divination rites -- in particular, the
accepted -- where the captured opponent's piece isBabylonian astrolabe, and type 3 pieces originated in
taken off the board -- this involves a different gameIndian race games.
concept -- a different "mind set". And it was thenAccording to Josten, chess did not spring fully
just a matter of time before different types ofdeveloped into existence in 600 AD but evolved over
military forces, with different powers and valuesthe first two or three centuries of the first millenium
would be introduced.-- in particular between 50 BC and 200 AD. This
This transition from race game to war game isdevelopment took place in a number of places --
important. But perhaps the most significantIndia, China, and all along the Silk Road to Europe --
evolutionary step -- and the one most difficult toand each of the areas would have influenced the
explain -- was the elimination of the dice as theothers.
means of determining moves. As Yuri Averbakh, aBut the most likely place where it all came together
Russian chess historian, points out, this was notwas the Kushan Empire, the eventual successor to
something that would happen "naturally" within a purethe old Indo-Greek Kingdom. This was the central
Indian context.Asian area encompassing much of northern India,
As he says, "To change the Indian war game intoPakistan, and Afganistan.
chess it was necessary to throw away the dice.As we saw with the Indo-Greek Empire, this area
Unlike the previous stages which were typical for thestood at the crossroads of Europe, India and the
evolutional way of the game`s development andOrient, and was deeply influenced by Greek culture.
were not contrary to the customs of the Indians andMost importantly, the Kushans were cultural, religious
their religious beliefs, giving up dice was a radical, aand linguistic synergists. They took elements from
revolutionary step forward that not only changed thevarious cultures and forged these elements into
game itself but also its philosophy. In fact, that stepsomething new and different.
meant the withdrawal from the principle of Karma -This, according to Josten, is exactly what happened
the basic principle of the Indian philosophy. Now theto the game of chess in the early centuries of the
result depended entirely on the players' will, on theirfirst millenium. It is also why we have so few hard
choice. They became complete masters of theirfacts about this influential period. As he says,
destiny.""Following the gradual disintegration of the Kushan
According to Averbakh this would not haveEmpire, the neighbouring conquering states each
happened without the influence of Greece uponclaimed to be the intellectual authors of chess, with
northern India. This influence stretched back tono mention of the losers of the battles, the
Alexander the Great in the 4th century BC andKushans.... The fall of the Kushan Empire may thus be
developed even further within what historians call thethe main reason why so many facts have been lost
Indo-Greek Kingdom. This was a large area includingand so many unbelievable legends have arisen around
much of Afganistan and northern India which wasthe genesis of chess...